Ganapati Bhikarao Naik Vs Nuclear Power Corporation Of India Limited 2024 INSC 871 - Article 226 Constitution- Labour Court

Constitution of India - Article 226 - Labour Court - When Labour Court reached the factual conclusion, after due consideration of the material evidence, such factual finding should not normally be disturbed by a Writ Court without compelling reason. (Para 12)

Summary: The appellant, as a family member of a land-loser, whose land was acquired for the Kaiga Atomic Power Project, had secured the job as the son-in-law, of the land-loser - Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court in the Reference from the evidence of the witnesses concluded that the appellant had married the daughter of the land-loser - High Court set aside the Labour Court order holding that the appellant had misrepresented that he is the son-in-law of the land-loser - Allowing appeal, SC observed: Relevant materials reflecting the marriage was ignored by the Writ Court. The Court also failed to appreciate that the Labour Court reached the factual conclusion, after due consideration of the material evidence. Such factual finding of the Labour Court should not normally be disturbed by a Writ Court without compelling reason.